You trusted a local partner to handle compliance and keep operations above board. They were well-connected, familiar with the terrain, and seemed like the safe choice. But over time, inconsistencies started to show—figures that didn’t add up, deadlines that slipped, and reporting that just didn’t make sense. Now you’re wondering whether confronting them might trigger legal retaliation, reputational damage, or worse.
This case study is especially relevant if you are:
-
A founder operating in fragile or loosely regulated jurisdictions
-
A board member facing opaque reporting from local partners
-
An investor trying to assess silent compliance risk
-
A legal advisor unsure how to respond without provoking escalation
-
A stakeholder responsible for preventing reputational blowback
The mistake wasn’t partnering. The mistake would’ve been ignoring the signs.
This case study walks through how Pholus was brought in to discreetly investigate a stakeholder suspected of misreporting financial data to both the founder and authorities. Rather than confront or escalate, we quietly audited the documentation, uncovered a pattern of risk, and advised a clean disassociation—without triggering scandal, lawsuits, or partnership disputes.
Download it now and read it quietly. You’ll know if it applies.
