Board Advisory & Governance

Your board sets the tone for everything that follows. We help directors and leadership teams build governance practices that create accountability, enable decisive action, and protect long-term value. Whether you're facing transition, managing complexity, or rebuilding credibility, we bring the expertise to get it right.

Every Governance Failure Looks Unique Until You've Seen the Pattern

Board members who won't ask hard questions. Executive teams operating without real oversight. Fiduciary responsibilities that exist in theory but not in practice. Risk committees that review reports instead of challenging assumptions. Governance structures built for appearances, not pressure.

From the inside, your board challenges feel personal, context-specific, and impossible to untangle without causing more damage. But governance breakdowns aren't random—they follow predictable paths.

The board that champions "founder vision" until that vision becomes liability. The committee structure that looked rigorous until a real crisis exposed it as theater. The succession plan everyone agreed on until the succession actually happened. The governance controls that satisfied auditors but didn't prevent the breach.

We're former operators who've rebuilt boards after catastrophic failures, managed transitions that could have destroyed organizations, and stabilized governance during moments when everything hung in the balance. We've been inside companies where board dysfunction almost killed the business—and inside others where strong governance saved it.

That history taught us something critical: board problems compound in predictable ways. Recognize the trajectory early, and you can still correct course.

We help you diagnose what's actually breaking down, distinguish between symptoms and root causes, and build governance structures that function under stress—not just during quarterly reviews.

At a Glance: Board Advisory & Governance in Practice

  • Who We Help: Directors, executives, and leadership teams navigating governance gaps, board transitions, fiduciary challenges, or structural reform.

  • Typical Situations: Succession planning, board composition issues, governance breakdowns, regulatory scrutiny, stakeholder conflicts, or organizational restructuring.

  • Our Role: Strengthen board effectiveness, clarify roles and accountability, resolve governance conflicts, and build frameworks that align oversight with strategic execution.

  • How We Work: Diagnostic assessment → Discreet intervention → Structural reinforcement. Always confidential, always rooted in fiduciary responsibility.

  • Outcomes: Improved board function, stronger risk oversight, restored stakeholder confidence, and governance structures built to endure pressure.

  • How to Get in Touch: Fill out this form or contact us on Signal at pholus.01 for a confidential discussion.

We work with a limited number of organizations each quarter to ensure we can provide the depth of engagement governance work requires. Current availability for new clients is limited.

Where Are You in Your Journey?

Setting Up Governance for the First Time?

You're formalizing board structure, establishing advisory relationships, or building oversight mechanisms that match your growth stage. You need to get it right before pressure exposes structural weaknesses.

Board Not Working the Way It Should?

Board-management breakdown. Succession paralysis. Oversight failures. Independence problems. Crisis governance collapse. Your board structure exists but isn't actually functioning. Time to rebuild it.

Why This Matters: Board Formation & Setup

Most governance failures are baked in during setup - before the first meeting ever happens.

What Standard Board Formation Misses

  • The role confusion trap: You assign titles without defining actual decision rights, so every strategic choice becomes a negotiation about "whose job is this really?"
  • The meeting theater risk: You schedule monthly check-ins but never define what requires board approval versus executive judgment, so founders either ask permission for everything or ignore the board entirely until it's too late.
  • The friend-as-fiduciary problem: You seat people based on loyalty or access rather than governance skill, and six months later they're giving operational advice they're not qualified to give while avoiding the strategic questions they should be asking.
  • The documentation gap: You never write down how decisions get escalated, what constitutes a quorum, or how conflicts get resolved, so the first real disagreement exposes that nobody actually knows the rules.
  • The founder protection blind spot: You don't structure liability protections or decision-making boundaries, leaving founders personally exposed when the board needs to act decisively on termination, fundraising, or legal matters.
  • The informal override: You build a formal governance structure but tolerate side conversations and hallway decisions that undermine it, training everyone that the real power lives outside the boardroom.

What a Failed Board Setup Really Costs

  • Time: Six months wasted in meeting after meeting where nothing gets decided because nobody's clear on decision rights, authorities, or what "advisory" versus "fiduciary" actually means.
  • Talent: Your best executive quits because they're tired of getting second-guessed by board members who don't understand the operational context but think their title gives them override authority.
  • Strategic momentum: The board becomes a bottleneck instead of an accelerant because every decision requires re-litigating who has authority, what approval means, and whether this counts as strategic or operational.
  • Founder relationships: Trust fractures between founders and board members because expectations were never aligned, communication rhythms were never set, and now every conversation feels like a power struggle.
  • Crisis response capacity: When something actually breaks (fraud, legal threat, sudden departure), the board can't move decisively because the structure was built for peace-time theater, not pressure-tested decision-making.

What We Do Differently

  • We design governance structures for organizations operating in complex, high-stakes, or founder-dependent environments where standard board templates don't account for the actual risks you face
  • We define decision rights, escalation protocols, and communication rhythms before the first meeting so everyone knows what the board owns, what management owns, and where collaboration happens
  • We build in founder protection mechanisms (liability shields, decision boundaries, exit frameworks) so the structure supports leadership instead of creating exposure
  • Governance design that prevents dysfunction, role clarity that stops meeting theater, framework building that makes the board an asset from day one

What A Board Formation Engagement Delivers

Every engagement is shaped by your organization's stage and complexity, but here's what board formation typically includes:

  • Governance structure design: Decision rights framework, authority boundaries, and escalation protocols documented so everyone knows what the board owns, what management owns, and where collaboration happens
  • Role definition and responsibility mapping: Clear documentation of what "advisory," "fiduciary," and "strategic oversight" actually mean in your context, with concrete examples of what crosses into each domain
  • Meeting rhythm and agenda framework: Cadence, format, and content structure that makes meetings productive instead of performative, with templates that prevent drift into operational weeds
  • Communication protocols: How information flows between board and leadership (reporting format, update frequency, escalation triggers) so nothing important gets lost in email threads or side conversations
  • Liability protection and governance safeguards: D&O insurance guidance, indemnification frameworks, and decision documentation practices that protect individuals when the board needs to act decisively
  • Board composition strategy: Skills assessment, role definition, and recruitment guidance to ensure you're seating people for governance capability, not just access or loyalty
  • Onboarding and orientation support: New board member integration that sets expectations, clarifies boundaries, and prevents the "helpful board member giving unqualified operational advice" problem
  • Governance documentation package: Bylaws review, board resolution templates, conflict-of-interest policies, and decision logs that create institutional memory and legal defensibility

We don't deliver governance templates you could download for free. We deliver structures built for your actual operating environment, your actual risks, and your actual decision-making culture.

Build Governance That Works Before You Need It To

Most companies formalize governance when they're forced to—by investors demanding seats, by crises exposing structural gaps, or by complete operational collapse. By then, you're reacting under pressure instead of designing with clarity.

We help you establish board structures, advisory frameworks, and oversight mechanisms before crisis forces improvisation. Governance that enables growth instead of constraining it. Structure that serves the business you're building, not just investor requirements or compliance checklists.

You're Raising Capital and Investors Want Board Representation

Your seed round is closing and investors are asking for board seats. You've operated informally until now. You don't know what "normal" board governance looks like. You're not sure what rights to give up or what protection you need.

Getting board structure wrong during fundraising creates problems that compound for years—especially when you accept terms that sound reasonable but create deadlock, when you give investors veto rights you didn't understand, or when board composition makes future rounds harder to close.

We help you understand what investors are actually asking for versus what's standard, design board structures that protect founder control while providing legitimate oversight, and negotiate governance terms that don't handicap your ability to operate or raise future capital.

We'll help you draft governance documents that work in practice, establish meeting cadences and information flow that satisfy investors without consuming all your time, and avoid common structural mistakes that create problems during Series A and beyond.

This isn't about fighting investors or maintaining total control—it's about building governance structures that align incentives and enable decision-making as you scale.

We help you determine what board rights are reasonable versus overreach, how to structure voting and observer rights, and what governance commitments you can actually deliver on without destroying operational velocity.

We advise you during term sheet negotiation and board formation. We don't take board seats. You control the structure. We bring fundraising governance expertise, term sheet analysis, and honest assessments of what terms will help versus hurt as you grow.

You're Scaling Beyond Founder Capacity and Need Strategic Oversight

You've grown past the stage where founder intuition is sufficient. You need outside perspective on market strategy, operational decisions, or technical direction. You're making bigger bets with more at stake. You need people who can challenge your thinking without slowing you down.

Operating without external oversight during rapid scaling creates blindspots that don't reveal themselves until they're expensive—especially when you're too close to the business to see strategic mistakes, when hiring or expansion decisions need validation, or when you need domain expertise you don't have in-house.

We help you determine whether you need an advisory board, a formal board, or just strategic advisors, identify what expertise gaps are actually slowing you down, and design governance structures that provide value without creating bureaucracy.

We'll help you recruit advisors or directors with relevant domain expertise, establish engagement models that get you honest feedback without micromanagement, and structure compensation that attracts serious people without giving away significant equity.

This isn't about building governance for appearances or checking boxes for investors—it's about getting strategic leverage when founder bandwidth is becoming the constraint.

We help you determine who should be in the room for different types of decisions, how to structure advisory relationships that provide accountability without formal governance, and when informal advisory structures need to become formal boards.

We advise you on governance design and recruiting. You control the structure. We bring experience building governance at different organizational stages and honest assessments of what level of oversight actually helps.

You're Entering Regulated Industries or Complex Markets

You're moving into healthcare, financial services, government contracting, or other heavily regulated spaces. You need compliance expertise you don't have. You need people who understand regulatory risk and can guide you through it. You can't afford to learn by making expensive mistakes.

Operating in regulated industries without governance expertise leads to violations that can kill your business—especially when compliance failures trigger enforcement action, when you don't understand licensing requirements until you've already violated them, or when regulatory relationships require credibility you don't have.

We help you assess what regulatory expertise you actually need at the board or advisory level, identify individuals with relevant agency relationships and compliance background, and structure governance that helps you navigate regulation without becoming paralyzed by it.

We'll help you understand what compliance oversight looks like in practice, establish processes that satisfy regulators without destroying operational speed, and build relationships with people who can open doors and provide early warning when you're heading toward problems.

This isn't about building a board full of former regulators to create the appearance of compliance—it's about getting real guidance from people who understand how enforcement actually works.

We help you determine what expertise is critical versus nice-to-have, how to structure advisory relationships with former regulators or industry veterans, and what governance commitments regulators or partners will expect before they work with you.

We advise on governance structure and recruiting. We can connect you to relevant domain experts. You control who joins. We bring regulatory governance experience and honest assessments of what credibility you need to build.

You're Building Something Controversial and Need Cover

Your business model lives in legal or regulatory gray areas. You're entering markets where incumbents will fight you. You need credible people who provide legitimacy and strategic guidance when things get complicated. You need governance that signals you're serious, not reckless.

Operating in controversial spaces without credible governance makes you an easy target—especially when regulators are looking for reasons to act, when competitors are looking for angles to attack, or when you need to convince partners and customers you're not going to implode.

We help you identify what kind of credibility you need and who can provide it, design governance structures that demonstrate seriousness without constraining your ability to move quickly, and recruit advisors or directors who understand risk tolerance and won't panic at the first sign of pressure.

We'll help you assess whether formal board structure is necessary or whether strategic advisors provide sufficient coverage, establish governance practices that create defensibility if challenged, and build relationships with people who've navigated similar regulatory or competitive environments.

This isn't about building a board to hide behind—it's about demonstrating that smart, credible people believe in what you're building and are willing to put their names on it.

We help you determine what governance structure provides meaningful protection versus cosmetic cover, who can provide credibility without creating operational constraints, and how to structure relationships with advisors who understand working in contested spaces.

We advise on governance strategy and recruiting. We can serve as advisors if appropriate. You control composition. We bring experience in controversial markets and honest assessments of what governance actually provides protection versus theater.

You're Facing Founder Conflict and Need Structure Before It Destroys the Company

You and your co-founders are starting to disagree on major decisions. There's no clear tiebreaker mechanism. Equity split and decision rights seemed fine when you agreed, but now they're creating deadlock. You need governance structure before disagreement turns into paralysis or separation.

Founder conflict without governance structure destroys companies faster than competition—especially when deadlock prevents necessary decisions, when ambiguous authority creates resentment, or when you need separation frameworks that don't exist because you never formalized governance.

We help you establish decision-making frameworks before conflict escalates, design governance structures that create clarity on authority and tiebreaking, and build separation mechanisms if it becomes clear founders need to part ways.

We'll help you formalize board structure that includes outside perspective to break deadlock, establish voting and decision rights that enable forward movement, and create processes for resolving disputes before they become existential.

This isn't about forcing founders apart or taking sides—it's about creating structural clarity before ambiguity destroys what you've built.

We help you determine whether founder conflict is resolvable with better structure or whether separation is necessary, how to design governance that breaks deadlock without marginalizing any founder, and what mechanisms protect everyone if the partnership can't continue.

We advise all founders involved. We don't take sides. You control the outcome. We bring experience resolving founder conflict and honest assessments of whether your partnership can work with better structure or needs to end.

Get Governance Right From the Start

Most first-time board mistakes are structural and expensive to fix later. Talk to someone who's built governance at every stage before you lock in decisions you'll regret.

Discuss board challenges with experienced advisors.

The boardroom is where strategy meets accountability. Strong governance ensures both survive contact with reality.

How We Design Governance That Works From the Start

Whether you're setting up your first advisory board or formalizing governance for investor requirements, we follow a design-driven process that moves from strategic assessment to sustainable implementation. Clear milestones at every phase.

Phase 1: Week 1 — Governance Strategy & Design

The first week determines whether your governance serves the business you're building or just satisfies external requirements. We assess your stage, strategic needs, and stakeholder expectations to design board structures that provide value, not bureaucracy.

We conduct stakeholder interviews to understand what investors, founders, and executives actually need from governance, assess your operational complexity to determine what oversight level makes sense, and evaluate regulatory or market requirements that influence board composition.

We help you determine whether you need an advisory board, formal board, or combination of both, identify what expertise gaps board members should fill versus what you can hire for, and design governance structures that match your current stage while enabling future growth.

This isn't about copying competitor board structures or following generic startup governance templates. It's about designing governance that serves your specific situation—your capital structure, your market, your growth trajectory.

Outcome: Clear governance strategy, board structure design, preliminary composition requirements, roadmap for implementation.

Phase 2: Week 2-4 — Board Composition & Recruitment

Once we've designed governance structure, we identify and recruit board members or advisors who provide the expertise, credibility, and strategic perspective you actually need.

We develop detailed board member profiles that specify required expertise, industry relationships, and governance experience, identify candidates through our network and your stakeholder connections, and manage recruitment conversations to assess fit beyond resume credentials.

We help you evaluate candidates for genuine strategic value versus impressive titles that don't translate to useful guidance, negotiate compensation structures that attract serious people without giving away excessive equity, and design onboarding that establishes clear expectations from day one.

This phase is about quality over speed. The wrong board member creates years of problems. We help you avoid common mistakes—recruiting friends who won't challenge you, adding investors who can't separate board role from capital relationship, or selecting advisors based on brand name rather than relevant expertise.

Outcome: Board members or advisors recruited, compensation structures established, clear role expectations documented.

Phase 3: Week 5-8 — Governance Implementation & Launch

Final phase focuses on operationalizing governance structures so your first board meetings generate value instead of exposing that nobody knows what they're doing.

We develop governance documents that reflect your actual structure and decision-making authorities, establish meeting cadences and information flows that enable effective oversight without consuming excessive time, and create board processes that generate genuine strategic discussion instead of status updates.

We help you prepare for initial board meetings so you're presenting strategic questions rather than operational details, establish communication protocols between board members and management, and design feedback mechanisms that surface governance problems early.

We facilitate your first 1-2 board meetings to ensure processes work in practice and adjust frameworks based on initial performance. This isn't about permanent facilitation—it's about ensuring structures launch successfully.

Outcome: Governance documents finalized, initial board meetings completed successfully, sustainable processes established, your team capable of running governance independently.

Stop Guessing About Board Structure

Advisory board or formal board? Equity compensation or cash? Independent directors or investor seats? Get answers from people who've designed governance that actually works.

Discuss governance design with experienced operators.

Board dysfunction doesn't announce itself—it accumulates quietly until it can't be ignored.

Governance Failures Follow Patterns. Once You See the Pattern, You Can Fix It.

Board-management breakdown. Succession paralysis. Fiduciary blindspots. Board capture. Crisis governance collapse. From the inside, your board situation feels unique: too political, too entrenched, too broken to fix without tearing everything apart. The relationships are too complicated. The history is too messy. The personalities make change impossible.

We help you diagnose what's actually breaking down, identify which problems are structural versus interpersonal, and rebuild governance frameworks before dysfunction destroys what you've built.

What Standard Governance Fixes Miss

  • The trust erosion you can't see: Board members are frustrated but staying silent, founders feel micromanaged but won't say it, and everyone's waiting for someone else to name the problem before it explodes into resignations or votes of no confidence.
  • The shadow decision system: The real choices happen in side conversations, hallway deals, or bilateral founder-board chats because the formal structure failed so badly that everyone routes around it by default.
  • The meeting dysfunction pattern: Meetings run long, nothing gets resolved, action items vanish into email threads that go nowhere, and everyone leaves more confused than when they arrived, but nobody knows how to reset without triggering conflict.
  • The founder silence spiral: The founder stops showing up, stops reporting, or goes radio silent because they feel unsupported, second-guessed, or burned out, and the board interprets silence as defiance instead of distress.
  • The structural exposure nobody mapped: There's no D&O insurance, decision authorities were never documented, liability protections don't exist, and the first legal threat or regulatory question exposes that the governance was built on assumptions, not frameworks.
  • The cascading mistrust: One broken commitment or misaligned expectation snowballs into suspicion, defensiveness, and people choosing exit over repair because nobody knows how to de-escalate without looking weak.

What Governance Dysfunction Really Costs

  • Leadership stability: The founder is one bad meeting away from resigning, and if they go, the organization loses institutional knowledge, stakeholder relationships, and operational continuity that can't be replaced.
  • Board composition: Your best board members start quietly planning their exit because they're tired of dysfunctional meetings, watching avoidable problems get worse, and feeling like their guidance goes ignored or gets weaponized.
  • Stakeholder confidence: Investors, donors, or partners hear whispers that "the board isn't aligned" or "leadership is struggling," and suddenly funding conversations stall, partnerships pause, and you're managing perception instead of growth.
  • Operational paralysis: Decisions that should take one meeting take four because nobody trusts the process, everyone's afraid of stepping on toes, and the boundary between strategic and operational has dissolved into constant renegotiation.
  • Legal and financial exposure: When something actually breaks (fraud, departure, lawsuit), you discover the governance structure can't handle it because roles weren't documented, authorities weren't clear, and nobody's protected from personal liability.

What We Do Differently

  • We specialize in governance repair for boards in crisis, founder-board breakdowns, and situations where trust has eroded but the mission still matters and the stakeholders want to stay
  • We diagnose what's actually broken (role confusion, communication gaps, structural flaws) versus what's just symptomatic, then rebuild the frameworks that make aligned decision-making possible again
  • We facilitate realignment conversations that de-escalate tension, reset expectations, and create space for honest dialogue without forcing anyone into corners or triggering exits
  • Governance recovery that restores function, relationship repair that rebuilds trust, structural redesign that prevents the same problems from surfacing again

What A Governance Recovery Engagement Delivers

Every engagement is shaped by what's broken and how long it's been breaking, but here's what governance recovery typically includes:

  • Diagnostic assessment: Confidential stakeholder interviews (board members, founders, key executives) to surface what's actually broken versus what's just symptomatic, with documented patterns and root causes
  • Trust repair facilitation: Structured conversations that de-escalate tension, reset expectations, and create space for honest dialogue without forcing exits or triggering defensive posturing
  • Decision rights realignment: Clarification of who owns what decisions, where approval is required versus advisory, and how to distinguish strategic oversight from operational interference
  • Communication framework rebuild: New reporting rhythms, meeting structures, and escalation protocols that restore information flow and prevent the shadow decision-making that replaced formal governance
  • Relationship reset between founder and board: Individual coaching, expectation alignment, and governance redesign to address founder burnout, silence, or disengagement before it becomes permanent
  • Board composition evaluation: Assessment of whether current members are the right fit, guidance on graceful exits if needed, and recruitment strategy to fill gaps without creating new dysfunction
  • Structural gap remediation: D&O insurance implementation, liability protection documentation, and decision-logging systems to close exposure gaps that weren't addressed during formation
  • Ongoing stabilization support: Follow-up sessions during the transition period to ensure new frameworks hold under pressure, catch regression early, and adjust protocols as reality diverges from plan

We don't deliver facilitation theater or governance audits that sit in a drawer. We deliver recovery that restores function, prevents exits, and rebuilds the trust required for aligned decision-making.

Governance Failures Follow Patterns. Once You See the Pattern, You Can Fix It.

Board-management breakdown. Succession paralysis. Fiduciary blindspots. Board capture. Crisis governance collapse. From the inside, your board situation feels unique: too political, too entrenched, too broken to fix without tearing everything apart. The relationships are too complicated. The history is too messy. The personalities make change impossible.

We help you diagnose what's actually breaking down, identify which problems are structural versus interpersonal, and rebuild governance frameworks before dysfunction destroys what you've built.

Board-Management Breakdown

Your CEO and board chair aren't speaking. Your executive team operates without real oversight. Your directors rubber-stamp decisions instead of challenging assumptions. Board meetings have become performance theater instead of governance.

These relationship and structural failures can paralyze decision-making during critical moments—especially when they involve trust erosion, role confusion, or competing power centers that make decisive action impossible.

We help you diagnose what's actually breaking down, identify whether the issue is structural or interpersonal, and design interventions that restore functional governance without destroying relationships or forcing unnecessary exits.

We'll help you clarify roles and accountability, rebuild communication channels between board and management, and establish decision-making frameworks that work under pressure. This isn't about forced reconciliation or cosmetic fixes—it's about creating governance structures that enable action.

We help you determine whether current leadership can be realigned or whether change is necessary, how to transition governance structures without operational chaos, and how to communicate changes to stakeholders without signaling deeper instability.

We advise and support your leadership. We don't take board seats. You remain in control. We bring structural analysis, governance frameworks, and honest assessments of what can be fixed and what can't.

Succession Crisis & Leadership Transition

Your founder is stepping back but won't let go. Your CEO succession plan looked solid until you actually needed it. Your board can't agree on next leadership. Your executive team is fracturing over who takes over.

Succession crises destroy organizational value faster than market downturns—especially when they involve ambiguous timelines, competing internal candidates, or founders who can't separate identity from ownership.

We help you assess what's causing the impasse, identify whether succession plans are realistic or aspirational, and build transition frameworks that preserve institutional knowledge while enabling new leadership to actually lead.

We'll help you establish clear transition timelines, design governance structures that support new leadership, and manage communication with employees, investors, and key stakeholders who are watching for signs of instability.

This isn't about pushing founders out or forcing premature transitions—it's about creating clarity when ambiguity is destroying value.

We help you determine whether succession should accelerate or whether transition structures need redesign, how to manage competing leadership claims without fracturing the organization, and how to preserve what works while enabling necessary change.

We advise your board and leadership team. We don't install ourselves as interim management. You control the timeline. We bring transition expertise, governance frameworks, and honest assessments of what each candidate can actually deliver.

Fiduciary Failure & Governance Blindspots

Your board didn't see the compliance breach coming. Your risk committee reviews reports but doesn't challenge assumptions. Your directors don't understand the business well enough to provide real oversight. Your governance structure satisfied auditors but failed to prevent disaster.

These oversight failures can trigger regulatory action, stakeholder lawsuits, and reputational damage that takes years to rebuild—especially when they expose that your board was documenting compliance instead of creating accountability.

We help you assess where oversight actually failed, identify whether the issue is board composition, information flow, or structural design, and build governance frameworks that create real accountability instead of just better documentation.

We'll help you redesign committee structures, improve the quality of information flowing to directors, and establish oversight mechanisms that catch problems before they become crises. This isn't about adding more meetings or expanding reporting—it's about fundamentally changing how your board engages.

We help you determine whether current directors have the capacity to provide real oversight or whether composition changes are necessary, how to rebuild governance credibility with regulators and stakeholders, and how to establish oversight that works during complexity, not just during stability.

We advise your board. We don't replace directors. You control governance changes. We bring fiduciary expertise, oversight frameworks, and honest assessments of where your governance actually broke down.

Board Capture & Independence Crisis

Your board protects management instead of challenging it. Your independent directors aren't actually independent. Your governance structure exists to satisfy investors but doesn't create real accountability. Your board has become an echo chamber.

Board capture destroys organizational resilience in ways that don't show up until it's too late—especially when long-tenured directors have lost objectivity, when board composition serves political rather than governance needs, or when "founder-friendly" has become code for "no real oversight."

We help you diagnose whether your board is truly independent or structurally captured, identify which relationships are compromising oversight, and design governance changes that restore accountability without triggering leadership crises.

We'll help you assess board composition objectively, establish processes that enable real challenge and debate, and create structural independence that goes beyond satisfying listing requirements. This isn't about hostile takeovers or forced director removals—it's about rebuilding governance that works.

We help you determine whether board refresh is necessary or whether process changes can restore effectiveness, how to introduce independent oversight without alienating founders or management, and how to transition from captured governance to functional accountability.

We advise leadership and select directors. We don't campaign for board seats. You control the process. We bring independence analysis, governance design, and honest assessments of whether your board can actually perform its fiduciary role.

When Your Board Has Stopped Functioning Entirely

Your company is in crisis and your board isn't equipped to handle it. Your directors are panicking instead of providing strategic guidance. Your governance structures worked fine during growth but are collapsing under pressure. Your board meetings are consuming hours but producing no decisions.

Crisis governance failures turn manageable situations into existential threats—especially when boards freeze, when oversight becomes interference, or when governance structures designed for normal operations can't adapt to emergency conditions.

We help you establish emergency governance frameworks that enable rapid decision-making while maintaining appropriate oversight, clarify roles when normal structures aren't working, and design communication protocols that keep directors informed without paralyzing action.

We'll help you determine what decisions require board approval versus executive action, establish rapid-response processes for crisis conditions, and manage board dynamics when stress is revealing fundamental dysfunction. This isn't about sidelining your board—it's about making governance work when speed matters.

We help you determine whether current directors can handle crisis conditions or whether temporary structural changes are needed, how to maintain fiduciary oversight without slowing critical decisions, and how to transition back to normal governance once the crisis stabilizes.

We advise your leadership team and board. We don't override governance authority. You retain decision rights. We bring crisis governance expertise, emergency frameworks, and honest assessments of whether your board is helping or hindering recovery.

Get Honest Assessment of What's Actually Wrong

Board problems rarely resolve themselves. They require diagnosis and structural intervention. Talk through what's happening with operators who've navigated governance crises.

Discuss board challenges with experienced advisors.

Every day your board spends in dysfunction is a day you're not making decisions that could save the business.

How We Restore Board Effectiveness

Whether you're building governance from scratch or fixing structures that have broken down, we follow a diagnostic-driven process that moves from assessment to sustainable implementation. Clear milestones at every phase.

Phase 1: Days 1-3 — Governance Diagnostic

The first 72 hours determine whether we're addressing symptoms or root causes. We assess current governance structures, identify what's actually breaking down, and establish whether problems are structural, compositional, or both.

We conduct rapid stakeholder interviews to understand competing perspectives on what's failing, review governance documents to identify gaps between stated structure and actual practice, and assess board dynamics to determine whether dysfunction is interpersonal or systemic.

We help you understand whether current governance can be fixed with process improvements or requires structural rebuilding, identify which board members are part of the solution versus part of the problem, and prioritize interventions that will have immediate impact versus longer-term structural work.

This isn't about comprehensive governance audits or elaborate assessment frameworks. It's about quickly diagnosing what's actually wrong so we can design targeted interventions instead of generic solutions.

Outcome: Clear diagnosis of governance breakdown, identification of root causes, preliminary roadmap for structural intervention.

Phase 2: Week 1-2 — Emergency Stabilization (Existing Boards Only)

Once we understand what's broken, we establish immediate governance frameworks that enable decision-making while we design longer-term structural solutions.

We create emergency decision-making protocols when normal board processes have become paralyzed, establish clear authority and accountability when role confusion is preventing action, and design communication frameworks that keep directors informed without slowing critical decisions.

We help you determine what decisions require board approval versus executive action, establish interim governance structures if current frameworks are completely dysfunctional, and manage board dynamics when stress is revealing fundamental problems that were always present.

This phase is about restoring your ability to make and execute decisions. We're not yet building permanent governance structures—we're creating temporary frameworks that work while we address deeper problems.

Outcome: Decision-making capacity restored, immediate governance paralysis resolved, foundation established for structural rebuilding.

Phase 3: Week 3-6 — Structural Rebuilding

With emergency frameworks in place, we design and implement governance structures that address root causes instead of just managing symptoms.

We redesign board composition if current directors lack necessary expertise or objectivity, restructure committee frameworks when existing structures don't enable effective oversight, and establish decision rights and authorities when ambiguity is creating ongoing conflict.

We help you develop governance documents that reflect actual practice instead of aspirational theater, create board processes that generate genuine challenge and debate instead of rubber-stamping, and design information flows that enable directors to provide real oversight.

This phase requires difficult decisions about board composition, leadership roles, and structural changes that some stakeholders will resist. We provide both strategic guidance and political support for changes that serve the organization even when they're uncomfortable.

Outcome: Sustainable governance structures established, board composition aligned with organizational needs, decision-making frameworks that work under pressure.

Phase 4: Month 2-3 — Implementation & Transfer

Final phase focuses on ensuring new governance structures become operational reality, not just documented improvements that get ignored once we're gone.

We support initial implementation of new governance frameworks to identify problems before they become entrenched, train board members and executives on new processes and expectations, and establish feedback mechanisms that catch dysfunction early.

We help you monitor whether new structures are actually improving governance or just creating different problems, adjust frameworks based on real-world performance instead of theoretical design, and transfer governance capability to your team so you're not dependent on ongoing advisory support.

This isn't about permanent consulting relationships. It's about building governance structures that work independently once we exit—and ensuring your team knows how to maintain them.

Outcome: New governance structures fully operational, board and management aligned on expectations, sustainable frameworks that don't require ongoing external support.

Stop Losing Time to Board Dysfunction

Every week your board spends paralyzed is a week you're not making decisions that could stabilize your business. Get diagnostic assessment from advisors who've rebuilt governance after breakdown.

Confidential discussion about board challenges.

Crisis reveals whether your governance was real or just well-documented fiction.

Why Work With Us

Governance advisory built on operational experience, not consulting frameworks. We've navigated the crises we now help you solve.

We've Been There

Our team has operated businesses through governance crises that should have been fatal. We've stabilized leadership during transitions that could have fractured organizations. We've been inside companies where board dysfunction almost killed the business—and inside others where strong governance saved it. That experience informs every engagement.

We Speak the Language

We understand the difference between governance that satisfies auditors and governance that actually works. We know what fiduciary responsibility means in practice, not just legal theory. We recognize the patterns that signal board capture, succession paralysis, or structural breakdown before they become obvious. We communicate in operational terms, not consulting frameworks or academic governance models.

We Work Fast

Governance problems compound while you're scheduling the next quarterly meeting. We establish emergency frameworks within days, not months. We provide rapid diagnostic assessment that identifies root causes instead of symptoms. We design interventions that restore decision-making capacity immediately, then build longer-term structural improvements. Speed matters when dysfunction is destroying value daily.

We Advise, Don't Replace

We don't take board seats unless specifically necessary for structural reasons. We don't install ourselves as interim management. We don't override existing governance authority. We provide strategic guidance and structural expertise while you retain decision-making control. You remain accountable for outcomes. We bring pattern recognition, governance frameworks, and honest assessment of what's fixable versus what requires rebuilding.

We Choose Our Engagements Carefully

Not every governance situation benefits from outside advisory. Some require legal intervention, not strategic guidance. Others need personnel changes we can't provide. We evaluate each potential engagement against our ability to create measurable impact and decline situations where we're not the optimal solution.

Real Governance Advisory, Real Outcomes

See how we've helped organizations rebuild board effectiveness, navigate leadership transitions, and restore governance structures after breakdown.

No posts were found.

Note: All case studies are anonymized to protect client confidentiality. Details changed to prevent identification while preserving strategic lessons.

The best time to build strong governance is before you need it.
The second best time is right now.

A Note from the Founder:

"I've operated businesses through governance crises that should have been fatal. Managed leadership transitions during chaos. Rebuilt stakeholder confidence after boards failed spectacularly. Those experiences taught me that governance structures rarely fail suddenly—they erode gradually, then break all at once. There's always a moment before the break when intervention still matters. This practice exists to help you recognize and act on that moment."

— John Cobb, Founder

Let's Talk About Your Governance Situation

Consent

No Sales Pitch

This isn't a discovery call designed to qualify you for services. It's a conversation to understand your situation and determine if we can actually help.

We Don't Share Details

Everything discussed stays confidential. We don't use your situation as a case study, don't reference your organization in marketing, and don't share information with anyone.

We'll Tell You if We're Not the Right Fit

If your situation requires different expertise, we'll say so. If structural problems can't be solved with advisory support, we'll tell you directly. No false promises.

Common Questions About Board Advisory & Governance

How is this different from traditional governance consulting?Traditional governance consultants build compliance frameworks, conduct board evaluations, and create documentation that satisfies regulatory requirements.

We work on governance structures that enable decision-making under pressure, not just governance that looks good on paper. Our team consists of former operators who've rebuilt boards after crisis, not consultants who've only studied governance academically.

Do you take board seats?Rarely, and only when structurally necessary.

We advise boards and leadership teams—we don't install ourselves as permanent board members. In some situations, particularly during emergency stabilization or leadership transition, temporary board participation makes sense. But our goal is always to design governance structures that work independently once we exit.

How long do engagements typically last?New board formation: 6-8 weeks from initial strategy through first board meetings.

Governance repair: 2-3 months from emergency stabilization through structural rebuilding.

Crisis governance intervention: As long as necessary—we don't work on fixed timelines when companies are in emergency conditions.

We don't create dependency relationships. Once governance structures are functional and your team can maintain them, we exit.

What if our board problem is really a people problem?Sometimes governance dysfunction is structural—wrong committee design, unclear authorities, captured oversight. Sometimes it's compositional—wrong people in board seats who can't provide necessary expertise or objectivity.

We diagnose which problem you're actually facing. If your issue is individual board member performance rather than structural design, we'll tell you directly. Governance advisory can't fix situations where the solution is personnel change, not process improvement.

Do you work with nonprofits or only for-profit companies?We work with both, though our approach is designed for operational organizations, not purely grant-funded nonprofits. We work with nonprofits that operate like businesses—generating revenue, managing complex stakeholder relationships, facing governance challenges that threaten organizational survival.

If your nonprofit board is ceremonial or fundraising-focused, we're probably not the right fit. If your board needs to provide genuine strategic oversight and you're facing governance breakdown, we can help.

What if we're not sure whether we need advisory board or formal board?That's exactly the conversation Phase 1 addresses. The answer depends on your stage, capital structure, regulatory environment, and what problems you're trying to solve.

Advisory boards provide strategic guidance without fiduciary responsibility or formal authority. Formal boards provide oversight and satisfy investor or regulatory requirements but come with legal obligations and structural complexity.

We help you determine which structure serves your actual needs versus which one checks boxes for external stakeholders.

Can you help us remove a board member who isn't working out?
We can advise on whether removal is necessary and help you navigate the process, but we don't handle the legal mechanics. Board member removal involves governance documents, shareholder agreements, and sometimes litigation.

We help you diagnose whether the problem is fixable through role clarification or whether the director genuinely needs to exit, design transition processes that minimize disruption, and identify replacement board members who fill actual gaps rather than repeating previous mistakes.

For legal execution, you need your corporate counsel.

Do you work internationally?Yes. Our team has operated across multiple continents and understand governance in different regulatory and cultural contexts. We work remotely for most engagements, with in-person presence when situations require it. Time zone coordination and travel logistics are manageable.

When We're Not the Right Fit

We're not the right fit if you're looking for governance consultants who build compliance frameworks, facilitate board retreats, or provide director training programs. We don't do governance audits, board evaluations, or create documentation to satisfy listing requirements.

We don't work:

  • With organizations seeking governance theater—structures that look good on paper but don't change how decisions actually get made
  • With leadership teams unwilling to make structural changes when diagnosis reveals current governance can't be fixed with process improvements
  • With boards looking for consultants who'll validate existing structures rather than challenge whether they actually work
  • In situations where the real issue is individual performance, not governance structure, and the solution is personnel change, not advisory support

Facing a critical situation?

Get practical insights for complex markets. No jargon. No noise.